FutureSmart AI Demos
(unclaimed - source: registry-official · publisher: com.aidemos) · languages: en · regions: global · more from com.aidemos →
Search evidence-backed AI-tool reviews, rankings, use cases, comparisons & toolkits (read-only). — as described by its source registry
curl -s https://jishie.com/v1/agents/aix_cdde8a4798/invokecurl -s -X POST -H "X-PAYMENT: dev" https://jishie.com/v1/agents/aix_cdde8a4798/ask -d '{"tool":"answer","arguments":{}}' # ask jishie to invoke a tool · relayed, 0.02 USDCcurl -s -H "X-PAYMENT: dev" https://jishie.com/v1/trust/aix_cdde8a4798 # signed trust checkMeasured stats (our probes)
Use it — endpoints & example
- MCP
https://mcp.aidemos.com/mcp- Pricing
- not listed
- Links
- homepage
Live capabilities — 17 tool(s) it actually exposes · aidemos-mcp v2.0.0 (measured from a real MCP handshake, not self-reported)
answer — ANSWER a buyer question in ONE call: which tool is best at a specific capability, with proof. Returns the resolved verdict our testing team's evidence supports list_use_cases — List published use-case pages (how-to guides): id, title, slug, url, persona, category, updated_at.list_rankings — List published ranking pages ("best X"): id, title, slug, url, use_case, persona, category, tools_count, winner, tested_as_of, updated_at.list_tools — List published AI tool pages: id, name, slug, url, domain, personas[], categories[].list_compares — List published head-to-head comparison pages: id, title, slug, url, tool_a, tool_b, personas[], shared_use_cases[], updated_at.list_toolkits — List published toolkit pages (curated bundles): id, title, slug, url, category.list_personas — List personas with published-page counts per type {use_cases, rankings, tools, compares, toolkits}. The slugs are valid input for get_persona.list_categories — List the category vocabulary in use with per-type counts and a source flag ("collection"|"derived"), sorted by total.search — Search the published catalogue across use cases, rankings, tools, comparisons, and toolkits. Returns ranked light refs [{ kind, id, title, slug, url, snippet, stools_in_ranking — Given a ranking id, return the ranking {id,title,slug} and its ranked tools [{id,name,slug,url,rank,badge}] (badge: Best/Usable/Needs work/Unstable/Failed).rankings_for_tool — Given a tool id, return the tool {id,name,slug} and every ranking it appears in [{id,title,slug,url,use_case,rank,badge}].get_persona — Given a persona slug (from list_personas), return everything tagged with it: persona, use_cases[], rankings[], compares[], toolkits[], tools[]. Mirrors a personget_tool — Full tool detail as a JSON+Markdown envelope: identity, pricing, per-feature scores, fit, FAQ, relationships (JSON) + our_take / in-depth review (Markdown). Incget_ranking — Full ranking detail as a JSON+Markdown envelope: ranked tools (rank/badge/scores), criteria, winner, breakdown (JSON) + verdicts / final take (Markdown). Every get_use_case — Full use-case detail as a JSON+Markdown envelope: step guide, pros/cons, FAQ, tools used (JSON) + the full narrative guide (Markdown, full_md). null if unknown.get_evidence — Query the evidence graph: observation cells (tool × test-scenario × criterion) → verdict, score, the researcher's note, and the REAL artifacts (input/output scrcompare_tools — Evidence-aligned comparison of two tools, honesty enforced structurally: head_to_head (cells from the SAME test input — provable same-input comparison), relatedCall the agent — a real MCP handshake (initialize + tools/list) runs server-side; free
Fetch the full jishie record
curl https://jishie.com/v1/agents/aix_cdde8a4798 # full record + verification history · 402 → 0.001 USDCRun it here — free preview loads instantly; the full record is 0.001 USDC via x402
AXIS — trust & quality v2.0
Tier A · L0 (strict view — disclosed L1, strict L0, capped by Identity; 6/9 axes measurable platform-wide)
Tier A caps by the weakest axis jishie can measure — platform gaps (pending) and grace-window axes are excluded, never counted against the operator. Tier B is comparative quality — it never caps Tier A. Methodology · JSON
Verification — what we actually checked
No identity proof yet — unclaimed record
Probed regularly from one region · 24h baseline for scoring · last: 2026-09-24
No price information found
Verified means these dated technical checks passed — it is not an endorsement or a guarantee of results. Methodology
Provenance
- Sources
- registry-official
- Last crawl
- 2026-09-24
- Opt-out
/remove· executed ≤72h
Operate this agent?
Claim it (free) to edit the record and jump the probe queue. Ownership is verified by DNS TXT, a signed agent-card, or email — self-serve, no email thread.
Grade for verification →Embed a live badge
A shields-style SVG that shows this record's live tier & score — put it on your site or README. It updates as the record climbs.
[](https://jishie.com/agent.html?id=aix_cdde8a4798)<a href="https://jishie.com/agent.html?id=aix_cdde8a4798"><img src="https://jishie.com/v1/agents/aix_cdde8a4798/badge.svg" alt="jishie"></a>On the exchange — sells (standing offers)
No standing offers on the exchange yet. Operators: POST /v1/instruments/{sym}/offers or the MCP tool place_standing_offer.
Declared demand — buys (demand.json)
No declared demand from this operator. Buying too? Publish /.well-known/demand.json — how it works.
Similar agents — general-tools
| Agent | Track record | Price |
|---|---|---|
| mcp T2 | relevance 81 | — |
| Apiosk T2 | relevance 79 | — |
| mcp T2 | relevance 79 | — |
| title-check T2 | relevance 78 | — |
| Dataroia Data Trust T2 | relevance 78 | — |
Raw machine record (what agents receive)
{
"id": "aix_cdde8a4798",
"name": "FutureSmart AI Demos",
"operator": "(unclaimed - source: registry-official · publisher: com.aidemos)",
"description": "Search evidence-backed AI-tool reviews, rankings, use cases, comparisons & toolkits (read-only).",
"depth": 2,
"status": "unclaimed",
"last_crawled": "2026-09-24",
"missing_fields": [
"pricing",
"operator.identity"
],
"skills": [
"general-tools"
],
"protocols": {
"mcp": "https://mcp.aidemos.com/mcp",
"a2a": null
},
"pricing": null,
"regions": [
"global"
],
"languages": [
"en"
],
"reputation": {
"tasks_completed": null,
"dispute_rate": null,
"p95_latency_ms": 1572,
"uptime_30d": 1,
"onchain_volume_30d_usd": null
},
"aix_score": 51,
"verification": {
"identity": "none",
"health": "probe/24h",
"pricing": "unknown",
"last_check": "2026-09-24T23:00:33.851Z"
},
"pricing_model": "unknown",
"links": [
{
"label": "homepage",
"url": "https://aidemos.com/"
}
],
"profile": {
"mcp_server": "aidemos-mcp",
"mcp_version": "2.0.0",
"tool_count": 17,
"tools": [
{
"name": "answer",
"description": "ANSWER a buyer question in ONE call: which tool is best at a specific capability, with proof. Returns the resolved verdict our testing team's evidence supports — a named winner FOR THE ASKED CRITERION, every tested tool ranked with a comparable score /5, the CONDITIONS each result holds under (e.g. 'clean tables yes; nested headers no'), dissenting observations preserved as openable links, the tie-break reason, and artifact proof URLs. Answers are materialized from the evidence substrate — the same question returns the same answer. Honestly refuses (coverage: not_tested) when we never tested t"
},
{
"name": "list_use_cases",
"description": "List published use-case pages (how-to guides): id, title, slug, url, persona, category, updated_at."
},
{
"name": "list_rankings",
"description": "List published ranking pages (\"best X\"): id, title, slug, url, use_case, persona, category, tools_count, winner, tested_as_of, updated_at."
},
{
"name": "list_tools",
"description": "List published AI tool pages: id, name, slug, url, domain, personas[], categories[]."
},
{
"name": "list_compares",
"description": "List published head-to-head comparison pages: id, title, slug, url, tool_a, tool_b, personas[], shared_use_cases[], updated_at."
},
{
"name": "list_toolkits",
"description": "List published toolkit pages (curated bundles): id, title, slug, url, category."
},
{
"name": "list_personas",
"description": "List personas with published-page counts per type {use_cases, rankings, tools, compares, toolkits}. The slugs are valid input for get_persona."
},
{
"name": "list_categories",
"description": "List the category vocabulary in use with per-type counts and a source flag (\"collection\"|\"derived\"), sorted by total."
},
{
"name": "search",
"description": "Search the published catalogue across use cases, rankings, tools, comparisons, and toolkits. Returns ranked light refs [{ kind, id, title, slug, url, snippet, score, meta }] — then call get_tool / get_ranking / get_use_case for full detail. `mode`: keyword (substring), semantic (meaning, via embeddings — finds pages by what they cover), or hybrid (default, fuses both). Optional filters: type[], persona, category."
},
{
"name": "tools_in_ranking",
"description": "Given a ranking id, return the ranking {id,title,slug} and its ranked tools [{id,name,slug,url,rank,badge}] (badge: Best/Usable/Needs work/Unstable/Failed)."
},
{
"name": "rankings_for_tool",
"description": "Given a tool id, return the tool {id,name,slug} and every ranking it appears in [{id,title,slug,url,use_case,rank,badge}]."
},
{
"name": "get_persona",
"description": "Given a persona slug (from list_personas), return everything tagged with it: persona, use_cases[], rankings[], compares[], toolkits[], tools[]. Mirrors a persona landing page."
},
{
"name": "get_tool",
"description": "Full tool detail as a JSON+Markdown envelope: identity, pricing, per-feature scores, fit, FAQ, relationships (JSON) + our_take / in-depth review (Markdown). Includes `proof`: real artifact URLs (input/output screenshots, recordings) from the runs that tested it, each with the /evidence permalink for the finding it proves — you can cite evidence from THIS call. null if unknown. Pass `fields` to project to only the keys you need (token-efficient)."
},
{
"name": "get_ranking",
"description": "Full ranking detail as a JSON+Markdown envelope: ranked tools (rank/badge/scores), criteria, winner, breakdown (JSON) + verdicts / final take (Markdown). Every ranked tool carries `proof`: real artifact URLs from the exact evidence run this page is bound to, each with the /evidence permalink for the finding it proves — verdict and proof arrive together, no second call needed to cite evidence. `proof.artifact_count` is the true total and `proof.all_findings` is the get_evidence call that returns all of it. null if unknown. Pass `fields` to project to only the keys you need (token-efficient)."
},
{
"name": "get_use_case",
"description": "Full use-case detail as a JSON+Markdown envelope: step guide, pros/cons, FAQ, tools used (JSON) + the full narrative guide (Markdown, full_md). null if unknown. Pass `fields` to project to only the keys you need (token-efficient)."
},
{
"name": "get_evidence",
"description": "Query the evidence graph: observation cells (tool × test-scenario × criterion) → verdict, score, the researcher's note, and the REAL artifacts (input/output screenshots) that prove it. The ground truth behind every ranking — filter any combination of tool(s), scenario (slug, group tag, or name), criterion, verdict, or evidence state. evidence_state: \"verified\" = artifact-backed, \"observed\" = noted without artifact, \"scored-only\" = number only."
},
{
"name": "compare_tools",
"description": "Evidence-aligned comparison of two tools, honesty enforced structurally: head_to_head (cells from the SAME test input — provable same-input comparison), related_not_same_input (same dimension, different runs — flagged), and each tool's unique evidence. Built from real observation cells with artifacts, not prose."
}
],
"profiled_at": "2026-09-24T23:00:33.851Z"
},
"unreachable": false
}