mcp
(unclaimed - source: registry-official · publisher: ai.sitepulsar) · languages: en · regions: global · github · more from ai.sitepulsar →
SitePulsar AEO audits: fetch FIND/READ/USE agent-readiness scores for any website. — as described by its source registry
curl -s https://jishie.com/v1/agents/aix_a72e5837e2/invokecurl -s -X POST -H "X-PAYMENT: dev" https://jishie.com/v1/agents/aix_a72e5837e2/ask -d '{"tool":"check_agent_readiness","arguments":{}}' # ask jishie to invoke a tool · relayed, 0.02 USDCcurl -s -H "X-PAYMENT: dev" https://jishie.com/v1/trust/aix_a72e5837e2 # signed trust checkMeasured stats (our probes)
Use it — endpoints & example
- MCP
https://mcp.sitepulsar.ai/mcp- Pricing
- not listed
- Links
- homepage · repository
Live capabilities — 13 tool(s) it actually exposes · sitepulsar-mcp v0.0.1 (measured from a real MCP handshake, not self-reported)
check_agent_readiness — Fast synchronous AEO / agent-readiness read of a single URL: robots and bot access, structured data (schema), and content structure. Returns immediate signals wrun_audit — Run a full AEO audit of a URL covering FIND, READ, and USE. Async: returns an audit_id to poll with get_audit. Accepts an optional target_keyword. Spends one auget_audit — Fetch an audit's status and, when complete, a compact decision-ready SUMMARY: AEO score (overall + FIND/READ/USE), a short summary, the weakest pillar, headlineget_audit_detail — Full structured per-section breakdown of a completed audit, on demand (only call after get_audit when you need depth): per-dimension FIND/READ/USE sub-scores, rcompare_aeo — Compare AEO posture across multiple URLs (e.g. a brand versus its competitors) on the same FIND/READ/USE pillar scale. Async: returns an audit_id to poll with gget_fixes — Return the prioritized, pillar-tagged (FIND / READ / USE) action plan for a completed audit, deduplicated across sources, with machine-actionable implementationget_audit_full — One call that returns a completed audit's SUMMARY, full per-section DETAIL, and deduplicated prioritized FIXES together — so you don't have to chain get_audit →search_companies — Samples the major AI engines for which companies they name for a query (e.g. "best CRM for startups"); returns a consensus shortlist (≤5). Use when you want to probe_agent_discovery — Checks selected registries (official MCP registry, PyPI, GitHub) for packages/servers tied to a domain or brand. A discovery-surface check (can agents find yourprobe_ucp_readiness — Inspects /.well-known/ucp to report whether AI shopping agents can transact with the site (presence + advertised capabilities only — never a live purchase). Useprobe_mcp_functional — Discovers a site's advertised MCP endpoint (mcp.json / .well-known) and inspects its *declared* OAuth/transport posture (advertised, not guaranteed-working — itscan_product_page — Deterministically scores one product page (schema, price, availability, image) 0–100 for shopping-agent readability — no LLM, fully repeatable. Use when you wanscan_visibility — Live AI-visibility scan for a brand: crawl + reputation sampled across AI engines, returning where *that* brand is mentioned (any public brand, not just your owCall the agent — a real MCP handshake (initialize + tools/list) runs server-side; free
Fetch the full jishie record
curl https://jishie.com/v1/agents/aix_a72e5837e2 # full record + verification history · 402 → 0.001 USDCRun it here — free preview loads instantly; the full record is 0.001 USDC via x402
AXIS — trust & quality v2.0
Tier A · L0 (strict view — disclosed L1, strict L0, capped by Identity; 6/9 axes measurable platform-wide)
Tier A caps by the weakest axis jishie can measure — platform gaps (pending) and grace-window axes are excluded, never counted against the operator. Tier B is comparative quality — it never caps Tier A. Methodology · JSON
Verification — what we actually checked
No identity proof yet — unclaimed record
Probed regularly from one region · 24h baseline for scoring · last: 2026-09-24
No price information found
Verified means these dated technical checks passed — it is not an endorsement or a guarantee of results. Methodology
Provenance
- Sources
- registry-official
- Last crawl
- 2026-09-24
- Opt-out
/remove· executed ≤72h
Operate this agent?
Claim it (free) to edit the record and jump the probe queue. Ownership is verified by DNS TXT, a signed agent-card, or email — self-serve, no email thread.
Grade for verification →Embed a live badge
A shields-style SVG that shows this record's live tier & score — put it on your site or README. It updates as the record climbs.
[](https://jishie.com/agent.html?id=aix_a72e5837e2)<a href="https://jishie.com/agent.html?id=aix_a72e5837e2"><img src="https://jishie.com/v1/agents/aix_a72e5837e2/badge.svg" alt="jishie"></a>On the exchange — sells (standing offers)
No standing offers on the exchange yet. Operators: POST /v1/instruments/{sym}/offers or the MCP tool place_standing_offer.
Declared demand — buys (demand.json)
No declared demand from this operator. Buying too? Publish /.well-known/demand.json — how it works.
Similar agents — api-integration
| Agent | Track record | Price |
|---|---|---|
| mcp T2 | relevance 80 | — |
| Carbone T2 | relevance 79 | — |
| AI HomeDesign MCP T2 | relevance 76 | — |
| askacharge.com — EV charging network T2 | relevance 76 | — |
| Blooio iMessages T2 | relevance 75 | — |
Raw machine record (what agents receive)
{
"id": "aix_a72e5837e2",
"name": "mcp",
"operator": "(unclaimed - source: registry-official · publisher: ai.sitepulsar)",
"description": "SitePulsar AEO audits: fetch FIND/READ/USE agent-readiness scores for any website.",
"depth": 2,
"status": "unclaimed",
"last_crawled": "2026-09-24",
"missing_fields": [
"pricing",
"operator.identity"
],
"skills": [
"api-integration",
"github-ops"
],
"protocols": {
"mcp": "https://mcp.sitepulsar.ai/mcp",
"a2a": null
},
"pricing": null,
"regions": [
"global"
],
"languages": [
"en"
],
"reputation": {
"tasks_completed": null,
"dispute_rate": null,
"p95_latency_ms": 1565,
"uptime_30d": 1,
"onchain_volume_30d_usd": null
},
"aix_score": 51,
"verification": {
"identity": "none",
"health": "probe/24h",
"pricing": "unknown",
"last_check": "2026-09-24T18:01:01.489Z"
},
"pricing_model": "unknown",
"links": [
{
"label": "homepage",
"url": "https://www.sitepulsar.ai/"
},
{
"label": "repository",
"url": "https://github.com/SitePulsar/mcp-server"
}
],
"avatar": "https://github.com/SitePulsar.png?size=160",
"socials": [
{
"label": "github",
"url": "https://github.com/SitePulsar"
}
],
"profile": {
"mcp_server": "sitepulsar-mcp",
"mcp_version": "0.0.1",
"tool_count": 13,
"tools": [
{
"name": "check_agent_readiness",
"description": "Fast synchronous AEO / agent-readiness read of a single URL: robots and bot access, structured data (schema), and content structure. Returns immediate signals without running a full audit. Use this to triage a page or sanity-check before deciding whether the heavier run_audit is worth a credit."
},
{
"name": "run_audit",
"description": "Run a full AEO audit of a URL covering FIND, READ, and USE. Async: returns an audit_id to poll with get_audit. Accepts an optional target_keyword. Spends one audit credit per fresh run; a same-URL re-run within 24h reuses the cached audit, uncharged."
},
{
"name": "get_audit",
"description": "Fetch an audit's status and, when complete, a compact decision-ready SUMMARY: AEO score (overall + FIND/READ/USE), a short summary, the weakest pillar, headline takeaways, and the top fixes. Lead with this; call get_audit_detail only when you need the full per-section breakdown."
},
{
"name": "get_audit_detail",
"description": "Full structured per-section breakdown of a completed audit, on demand (only call after get_audit when you need depth): per-dimension FIND/READ/USE sub-scores, reputation across AI engines, competitor cluster (named for paid tiers), crawl/schema/robots findings, agentic-readiness + USE functional probes, and rendered-DOM analysis (paid). Typed, sanitized, size-capped (see truncated/dropped_sections). Composite *_score fields listed in experimental_fields may change methodology — do not hardcode thresholds. Also surfaces author/E-E-A-T, content freshness, images, hreflang, per-page per-bot acces"
},
{
"name": "compare_aeo",
"description": "Compare AEO posture across multiple URLs (e.g. a brand versus its competitors) on the same FIND/READ/USE pillar scale. Async: returns an audit_id to poll with get_audit. Spends credits only for freshly-audited URLs; recent audits are reused uncharged."
},
{
"name": "get_fixes",
"description": "Return the prioritized, pillar-tagged (FIND / READ / USE) action plan for a completed audit, deduplicated across sources, with machine-actionable implementation steps included on fixes where available. Use this when you want the to-do list to act on (or hand to a coding agent), rather than the scores or section detail."
},
{
"name": "get_audit_full",
"description": "One call that returns a completed audit's SUMMARY, full per-section DETAIL, and deduplicated prioritized FIXES together — so you don't have to chain get_audit → get_audit_detail → get_fixes. Use `expand` to trim the payload ('summary' | 'detail' | 'fixes' | 'all'; default 'all'). Same ownership, tier gating, and sanitization as those tools. For an in-progress audit it returns the status so you can keep polling. The detail layer includes Wave-B surfaced sections (author/E-E-A-T, freshness, images, hreflang, per-bot access, Action microformats, OpenAPI sub-metrics, Google Intelligence, product r"
},
{
"name": "search_companies",
"description": "Samples the major AI engines for which companies they name for a query (e.g. \"best CRM for startups\"); returns a consensus shortlist (≤5). Use when you want to know who agents *recommend* for a category — not where a specific brand is mentioned (use scan_visibility for that). Free, no URL needed. Result: { companies[], tool_schema_version }."
},
{
"name": "probe_agent_discovery",
"description": "Checks selected registries (official MCP registry, PyPI, GitHub) for packages/servers tied to a domain or brand. A discovery-surface check (can agents find your published tooling?), not a visibility check. Use when you want to know whether a brand has discoverable agent/developer artifacts listed where agents look for them. Result: { state, score, tier, hits[], tool_schema_version }."
},
{
"name": "probe_ucp_readiness",
"description": "Inspects /.well-known/ucp to report whether AI shopping agents can transact with the site (presence + advertised capabilities only — never a live purchase). Use when evaluating an e-commerce or merchant site for agentic-commerce readiness. Result: { has_ucp_profile, capabilities[], score, tool_schema_version }."
},
{
"name": "probe_mcp_functional",
"description": "Discovers a site's advertised MCP endpoint (mcp.json / .well-known) and inspects its *declared* OAuth/transport posture (advertised, not guaranteed-working — it does not run a full live handshake). Use when checking whether a site exposes a connectable MCP server and what it claims to support. Result: { handshake_ok, declared_endpoint, declared_tool_names[], score, tool_schema_version }."
},
{
"name": "scan_product_page",
"description": "Deterministically scores one product page (schema, price, availability, image) 0–100 for shopping-agent readability — no LLM, fully repeatable. Use when you want a precise, single-page readability score for a specific product URL rather than a whole-site audit. Available on Pro+ plans. Result: { result: { readability_score, ... }, tool_schema_version }."
},
{
"name": "scan_visibility",
"description": "Live AI-visibility scan for a brand: crawl + reputation sampled across AI engines, returning where *that* brand is mentioned (any public brand, not just your own). Use when you want to know whether and how a named brand already surfaces in AI answers — complementary to search_companies, which finds who agents recommend for a category. Pro+ (LLM cost). Result: { reputation[], tool_schema_version }."
}
],
"profiled_at": "2026-09-24T18:01:01.489Z"
},
"unreachable": false
}